This industry runs on screenshots nobody can check: a cropped profit figure, a curve with no axis, a number in a colored box. This page is the opposite. Below is the TSOPEN backtest exactly as the NinjaTrader 8 Strategy Analyzer produced it: on a $50,000 funded account, over more than 7 years, with commissions accounted for, and the exact steps to reproduce it yourself. These are hypothetical results from a simulation over historical data. No real money was at risk.
Cumulative profit from the first trade in the report to the last. The shape matters more than the end point: where it climbs, where it goes flat, and where it gives money back.
Strategy Analyzer output, gross and before commissions, on a $50,000 account. A simulation over historical data, not the record of a live account, and no real money at risk.
The yearly and monthly averages are the backtest net divided by its period, nothing more. They are averages of a simulated past, not forecasts and not promises. Almost no month in the report actually looked like the average.
This is the box the Strategy Analyzer prints when a backtest finishes. It is the same box for every strategy anyone ever tests in NinjaTrader, which is precisely why we publish it instead of a graphic we designed ourselves. Here is what each line means, including the ones that are not flattering.
The performance summary as the platform prints it. Same tool, same fields, same layout as any other NinjaTrader backtest you have ever seen.
Look at the right-hand side of the curve and you can see it without being told: the line gets steeper. The last 7 months of the backtest produced $43,322 gross (about $41,200 net once commissions come out) on the same single $50,000 account, with the same rules and the same one window a day.
Divide that by 7 and you get roughly double the historical monthly average. We are not going to tell you why, because we do not know: more movement around the data releases is the obvious guess, and a guess is not a reason. Here are all three averages side by side.
The same report, zoomed into its final 7 months. Gross, before commissions.
All three averages come from the same backtest, on the same account, with the same settings, so they are comparable with each other and with nothing else. This is the evolution of a simulated past. It is not a forecast, it is not a trend you can extrapolate, and a stretch that runs at double the average can be followed by one that runs at half. Anyone who shows you their best seven months and calls it the new normal is selling something.
Every figure on this page comes from a simulation. The wording below is the standard one, and we mean every line of it.
A backtest is only worth something if you know what was tested and how. So here are the settings behind every number above, in plain language.
Four steps, and not one of them asks you to trust a sentence on this page.
Buyers get the exact settings (instrument, session template, parameters) in their account area, so there is no guessing about which configuration produced this report.
A page that only listed the good parts would be the exact thing we are asking you not to trust. Three limits, stated plainly.
Every trade above was filled by a simulator against historical data, with the benefit of knowing how the period ended. A system tuned hard enough will always look good on the data it was tuned on. That is the trap, and it has a name. Overfitting and curve fitting explains how to spot it, in our numbers and in anyone else's.
Commissions are set to zero in the report, so about 5% of that line is not yours: roughly $1 per micro contract, every round turn. On top of that comes slippage, the difference between the price the simulator gave you and the price a real order gets in a fast market. Both costs, worked out with real numbers.
The beginning of the curve is red. There are flat stretches where months of work go nowhere, and a $4,379 hole to sit through at the worst point. And it is wrong more often than it is right, on 53.8% of its trades. Drawdown is the number that decides whether you can actually live with a system.
You have the gross, the net, the win rate, the drawdown, the period and the steps to check all of it yourself. Run the numbers on the account size you would actually use, and if they make sense to you, the license is a single payment.
Something here does not add up, or you want a number explained before you spend a dollar? Ask us. It becomes a ticket with a reference and a person answers it.